5 Tips on Planning a Prenuptial Agreement

November 8th, 2011

Source: msnbc.com

It may be unromantic, but a prenup should at least be considered before saying ‘I do’

By Catherine New

“No prenup!” headlines gasped last year as Kelsey and Camille Grammer’s divorce went public. The star of Frasier reportedly is paying $50 million — serious money even by Hollywood standards — in the divorce settlement with his wife of 13 years.

Other celebrities take a more pragmatic attitude to love. Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise’s 2006 marriage agreement included a contract paying Holmes $3 million for each year they’re married, up to $33 million for 11 years of wedded bliss, in addition to a sizable house, reports said. After that, California law entitles her to half of Tom’s money should the marriage end.

For the rest of us, prenuptial agreements are considerably less high stakes —at least in strictly numerical terms. A few tens of thousands of dollars may mean more to the average couple than a million to Tom and Katie. And as unromantic as a prenup is, brides and grooms getting married this year — no matter what their net worths — should consider whether a premarital agreement is something they want, or need.

A quick financial inventory of you and your future spouse will reveal if you’re candidates for one. Typically checklists focus on what you do have (property, inheritance, business, earning potential). Just as important is what you don’t — like positive net worth. If you don’t own or owe much, and neither does your partner, then you probably don’t need a premarital contract. But with the average age of first-time brides and grooms increasing in the United States —28 for men and 26 for women today — couples are bringing more liabilities, including credit card debt, student loans and even mortgage debt into first marriages.

What are you really bringing to the altar?

States’ laws vary on marriage property. In most cases, what you brought into the marriage — such as title on a property or $10,000 in credit-card debt — remains yours, for better and for worse. However, if you and your spouse combine credit card accounts or add the new partner’s name to a property title, the responsibility becomes shared.

Other issues are affected as soon as you say “I do,” and the impact of monthly payments on a household budget or a couple’s ability to qualify for a home loan can cause financial tension. As couples combine their finances, make shared payments, or jointly fund big expenditures like home improvements, the lines between liability and ownership blur.

A prenuptial agreement can troubleshoot some of these issues in advance. Even as the stigma of prenups lingers, they are becoming more common, says Evan Sussman, a family law attorney who represents clients in Beverly Hills, Calif. In second marriages, they are more routine — around 20 percent of couples get them — but for first-time weddings, that number is still very low: 3 percent in 2010, up from 1 percent in 2002, according to a survey reported in USA Today.

Don’t Shy Away From Talking About Money

Financial advisers and family-law attorneys both agree that emotional issues are the biggest hurdle to broaching the topic of a prenup — and questions regarding money and marriage in general. Finances and feelings are like peanut butter and jelly: They seem to always to be stuck together. The dreaded phrase “I want to get a prenup” can push buttons of fear, anger and denial.

“That is the point couples get into therapy,” says Susan Pease Gadoua, a licensed therapist based in San Rafael, Calif., who specializes in divorce. “The man or woman had a realization and it has made them question if they are with the right person.” Last fall, The New York Times profiled a couple who ended their engagement after the fiancé learned his wife-to-be owed $170,000 in student loans.

Candace Bahr, a certified estate adviser in San Diego, says talking about money is part of the commitment of getting married.

“Let’s say you are saver, and you marry someone who is a lot of fun, but you have no idea where the money is coming from. You may be taking on their debt over time, and that can create a rift,” Bahr says. “As uncomfortable it is, talk to each other about what each of you has.”

“Bahr is concerned that too many women turn a blind eye to finances when their emotions are heightened.”I am still shocked that many women think that someone is going to come and rescue them,” she says. “A Prince Charming can fall off his horse. Even though you are in love, you need stand on two feet.”

Five tips for planning a prenup

1. Do it long before the wedding. Family-law attorney Sussman advises getting the agreement as early as six months to a year before a wedding date to ensure that both parties have had time to review it. Last-minute contracts are harder to enforce.

2. Step out of your emotions. The emotional roller coaster of falling in love and wedding planning can distort reality. Getting objective feedback can help separate what is real and what imagined. “My husband likes to joke that we lose 100 IQ points when we are falling in love,” says therapist Gadoua. “It’s called emotional flooding and we can learn to manage those emotions.”

3. Use your taxes as an excuse to talk about money. “Right now we are in tax season, so it’s a great time to look at finances,” says Bahr. “Look at each other’s returns as a way into the conversation. It can feel threatening, but it is important to have the uncomfortable conversation now, rather than later in a time of crisis.”

4. Make your agreement reasonable and enforceable. If you are preparing a prenuptial contract, establish your goals and don’t include fault clauses (like “If you cheat on me, you owe me $1 million”), advises Sussman. The goal is to have a contract that is enforceable and provide each spouse with a sense of exactly what they are getting if the marriage ends.

5. Research your state’s law regarding marriage and property. Marriage property laws are different from state to state. You can find more information about lawyers specializing in prenuptial agreements at the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

What About Grandma and Grandpa?

November 8th, 2011

By Dana Floyd

No one can dispute the important role grandparents play in a child’s life. However, with today’s changing family structures, grandparents can often be shut out of participating in a child’s life. To address such concerns, all states have enacted some type of grandparent visitation laws with varying degrees of requirements.

Overall, Texas law presumes that a parent acts in a child’s best interest. In other words, the law presumes that if a parent does not want a child to have time with a grandparent, then that parent is acting in the child’s best interest. As a result, the court will only counteract such parental choices in certain situations. However, if specific requirements are met, a court can authorize grandparent visitation.

First and foremost, any grandparent visitation must be in the child’s best interests and must overcome the presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of their own child. Specifically, a grandparent must show the court that denial of access to the child would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional well-being.

Additionally, a grandparent seeking access to a grandchild must be the parent of a parent who does not have actual possession of or access to the child themselves. In other words, the parent of the child must be deceased, in jail, found incompetent or for some other reason does not have actual or court-ordered access to the child. However, a grandparent may not request access to a child if both parents are deceased or have had their rights terminated by the adoption of the child.

Clearly, the Texas statute is very limited, but all hope is not lost for grandparents trying to maintain a relationship with their grandchildren. As always, it’s important to speak to an attorney about each specific situation to find a legal solution to your particular problem.

Time Is Money

August 31st, 2011

Dealing Successfully With a Divorce Attorney

Star Telegram, April 16, 2006

Dealing with divorce and divorce lawyers is not much different than taking a trip without first plotting out the route. If you go to a matrimonial lawyer without specific objectives or goals in mind, and think he or she can fix it for you, you’ll be disappointed. Given a specific set of facts, lawyers are trained to apply the law and advise clients about ways to attain specific goals – or at least some of them.

Here are some basic guidelines:

1. Gather as much of your financial and other information as possible before you go to see your lawyer. This includes tax returns and schedules, financial statements, budget documents and the like from at least the last five years.
2. Make sure your fee arrangement is in writing, that you understand it before you sign, and that everyone understands how you will pay your bill. Generally, lawyers are not allowed to take a percentage of what is recovered for you in a divorce case, so expect to pay by the hour.
3. Since you won’t always need to talk to your lawyer when you have questions, meet and get to know the paralegal or secretary so you can give and get information billed at lower rates.
4. Write out your questions, then make an appointment with the lawyer and take notes about what you’re told.
5. If there are billing questions, talk to the billing clerk or the secretary who handles this aspect of the business. The lawyer should be the last resort.
6. Photocopies made at the lawyer’s office may cost you 25 or more cents per page, sometimes plus the time of the person making the copies. So for numerous copies, consider making your own at copy shops to save money.
7. If you don’t understand something, ask. And if you have a problem with the way your lawyer is handling your case, also ask. Don’t allow the issue to fester.
8. Your lawyer should keep you reasonably informed about the status of your case by sending you copies of what goes out of the office. Then you’ll be less likely to make emergency calls. Remember: Spur-of-the-moment calls just to find out what’s going on can get expensive.
9. Don’t second-guess your lawyer based on the advice of friends and family. But if you feel strongly about a point, seek a second opinion. Let your lawyer know you feel this way.
10. Remember that your lawyer works for you. After you have been fully informed and have reviewed your options, you and your lawyer should decide upon a course of action suitable to your situation.
11. Don’t be surprised if your case takes time to get resolved. Although everyone is in a hurry to complete his/her case, you will have no control over scheduling issues that can keep your case in limbo for a long time.
12. If your lawyer promises or guarantees you a result, get another lawyer

– Jan Collins, a writer and editor, and Jan Warner, matrimonial tax and elder-law attorney.

Are We Married or Not?

August 31st, 2011

marriage

by Doug Wright

There is a common public misconception as to what it takes to create a common law marriage. Many people believe such a marriage is created by the length of time a couple lives together. The truth is that a couple could live together for many years, even have children, and still not be married. So what does it take to create a common law marriage or, as the Texas Family Code (Chapter 2, subchapter E) calls it, a marriage without formalities?

In Texas you can establish a common law marriage two ways. The first would be to execute a declaration under §2.402 of the Texas Family Code. This is a document signed under oath by both parties that they are married and registered with the county clerk. The second is a three-pronged test requiring evidence showing: a) an agreement to be married, b) cohabitation in Texas and c) a “holding out” to others that the parties are married.

The third prong, “holding out,” is the tough one. This requires that the couple represent to others that they are husband and wife. It is not enough that one of the parties represents that they are married if the other party never holds him or herself out to be married or confirms the representation. There may be evidence that both parties have made oral statements that they are husband and wife; however, I have found that the best evidence would be a document signed by both parties. My favorite is a federal income tax return. If they check the married filing jointly box and both sign the return, they are doing so under penalty of perjury. You might also want to see if they have both signed a deed, a lease or some other legal document that declares they are husband and wife. The document must make that representation of husband and wife or marriage to be valid proof (i.e., jointly purchasing property does not provide proof without the husband and wife designation nor does having a child).

It is a rebuttable presumption that the parties did not enter an agreement to be married if a divorce proceeding is not commenced within two years from the date the parties separated and ceased living together. So, there you have it — common law divorce.

So why would a person want to prove a common law marriage? It wouldn’t really matter in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. The marriage would not change the custody issues. It’s like everything else; it comes down to the money. With no marriage there is no community property. So if the parties acquired a lot of property during their cohabitation, one of them might want to prove that a marriage existed.

The Discovery Process

July 27th, 2011

In a divorce, it is often necessary to conduct “discovery” – which is the method by which a party can “discover” information about the other party that is relevant to the divorce.  Conducting discovery allows us to obtain full disclosure of particular facts, such as income and liabilities of the parties, the value of certain assets of the parties, and facts relevant to child custody and support issues.

The discovery process can be informal or formal.  Some common discovery methods include Interrogatories, Requests for Disclosure, Requests for Production of Documents, preparation of inventories, and depositions.

Interrogatories, Requests for Disclosure, and Requests for Production of Documents are three types of discovery often served upon a party in conjunction with each other.  Interrogatories and Requests for Disclosure are written questions requiring written responses from the other party.  Requests for Production of Documents are written requests to obtain documents from the other party that are relevant to the case – such as bank statements and financial records.  Interrogatories, Requests for Disclosure, and Requests for Production of Documents are served upon the other party (or the other party’s attorney) in writing, and the answers and documents are due back in writing within a certain time frame.

In some cases, it is necessary to prepare what we call Inventories and Appraisements of each party.  This is a formal list of each and every asset and debt of each of the parties.  This list must be prepared, sworn to, and filed with the Court.  Inventories and Appraisements are helpful tools whereby assets and debts can be valued and thereafter divided between the parties.

It is sometimes necessary for parties to conduct oral depositions to obtain sworn testimony before having a trial before the Court.  In an oral deposition, your attorney will ask the other party questions, and his or her answers will be recorded by a stenographer or court reporter.  It is also common for depositions to be videotaped.  Depositions allow the attorneys to gather information from each of the parties while under oath, and usually occur at the office of one of the attorneys.

Which discovery method(s) your attorney uses will depend on a number of factors that he or she will need to discuss with each client.  Each case is individual, and may or may not require some of the discovery methods discussed above.  However, when used, the discovery process can be a very valuable tool to help learn the facts, evaluate each case, and work toward a resolution.  If you have questions regarding the discovery process and whether you may need to use some of these methods in your divorce, a Bailey & Galyen attorney will provide you with a free consultation to discuss what may be appropriate for your individual case.

 

Collaborative Law Divorce – Because Your Family Deserves The Very Best

July 12th, 2011

by Jennifer L. Wiggins

Maybe you’ve stumbled across this article because your spouse is talking about filing for divorce. You’re in “bunker mode” — feverishly searching the Internet for information about what to expect and, most importantly, how to protect yourself. Or perhaps you’re the one contemplating the divorce. Either way, if you live in Texas, you must educate yourself about collaborative law.

There are three ways to get divorced in Texas. The easiest is the uncontested divorce. Here both spouses sit down and reach an agreement on all issues. Often only one attorney is involved, and that attorney serves to execute the agreements in the form of an agreed upon final decree of divorce. The second and most common way for couples to divorce is the traditional litigation model. One spouse files. The other spouse is served. The parties have a temporary orders hearing and the posturing begins:

  1. “I want this.”
  2. “I deserve this.”
  3. “The kids should live with me.”
  4. “I’m entitled to [fill in the blank].”

Each side begins conducting discovery, attempting at every turn to devalue property they want, enhance the value of property their spouse wants and uncover bad facts about the other parent. Throughout the process both sides are preparing for war — the final trial. But the final trial rarely occurs. By the time the discovery process is completed, the parties are exhausted, terrified and out of money. The idea of risking a bad result at trial almost always leads the parties to settle, either informally or through mediation. The end result is a hodgepodge of what you think is your best day in court versus what the other side will agree to. You walk away thinking, “could I have done better?”

The third way to divorce in Texas is through the collaborative law model. In collaborative law, all of your energy is focused on the final agreement. Both parties and their attorneys sign a contract promising to resolve every issue outside of court. If an agreement cannot be reached, the parties must get new lawyers and start from scratch. The crux of collaborative law is the team approach to putting the puzzle together. It starts by setting goals. Every step after that is aimed at helping both of you reach those goals. With the help of a neutral mental health professional and a neutral financial professional, you eliminate the posturing. The entire team’s energy is focused on achieving goals that the parties disclose in the first meeting. It’s still a negotiation, but it’s interest-based — e.g., “I want our children to stay in their same school” — rather than positional — e.g., “Well, I’m keeping the house.”

Clients who have been through the process say that the team approach is much more comforting than knowing it’s just you and your attorney suiting up for war. But I caution you — this is not group therapy. It’s a difficult process. The good news is that your team of professionals is organized around only one mission — helping you and your spouse achieve your goals. Divorce is a scary place to be. Choosing from the very beginning to handle the restructuring of your family in a private and dignified manner will ensure you and your former spouse can continue to communicate and cooperate long after the divorce is completed.

The Internet is filled with information about collaborative law. One of the best sources is the Collaborative Law Institute of Texas website at www.collablawtexas.com. This site can answer your questions, let you hear from actual clients who have participated in the process and let you search for an attorney who is trained in collaborative law. Bailey & Galyen also has information about collaborative law on its website. If you’re in that scary place searching for information about a pending or impending divorce, do yourself a favor and educate yourself and your spouse about collaborative law. I know you won’t be sorry you took the time to do this research. Doesn’t your family deserve the very best?

Family Law Mediation

July 12th, 2011

by Keith Spencer

Families going through a divorce or separation frequently must devise co-parenting plans to ensure continuity of care for children of multiple households. Simple matters, like consistent bedtimes and nighttime routines, are very important for children struggling to cope with a fractured household. However, it is often difficult for parents to set aside differences long enough to discuss and resolve such issues while struggling themselves to adapt to their new roles as single parents. Mediation allows parents the opportunity to craft child care plans tailored to their child’s specific needs and schedules rather than forcing the court to impose a generic and impersonal set of guidelines.

Mediation is a dispute resolution process that utilizes an impartial mediator specifically trained to work with cases involving children. Frequently, the parents are placed in separate rooms while the mediator shuttles back and forth between the two. Thus, parties and their advisors do not have to engage in face-to-face confrontations during the mediation process. Issues of child support, visitation, discipline, bedtimes, supervision, residency restrictions, extracurricular activities, travel and education can be addressed based upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the individual family. Recognizing that parents can make better decisions for their kids than can judges, mediation places the parents in charge of these life-changing decisions.

Family attorneys may refer their clients to a number of programs that prepare parents for their new roles as single parents and provide them with vital tools to promote effective co-parenting. Childreninthemiddle.com, theparentingcenter.org and texasafcc.org provide services and links to many organizations specializing in helping parents adapt to the co-parenting process. Many attorneys use these services to assist in the preparation of child care proposals, which will form the first proposals at mediation sessions.

Most family courts require the involved parties to attempt mediation prior to trial. Mediators vary widely in cost and experience. Local Dispute Resolution Centers provide a low-cost mediation experience. However, the mediators may or may not be attorneys and may or may not be familiar with family court. Retired judges frequently serve as mediators, utilizing their special knowledge and experience to assist parents. Such mediators are generally more expensive and may cost each party in excess of $500 per mediation session. It is important to note that mediators do not render decisions or rulings. Rather, they simply assist the parties in crafting a workable agreement. It is up to the parties to reach that agreement. Failure to do so simply means that the court will have to make the important decisions instead of the parties.

What is said in mediation stays in mediation. Settlement conferences and mediation sessions are privileged, and statements made or offers discussed in mediation cannot be raised at trial by either party. This promotes a free exchange of ideas without the necessity of posturing to protect one’s position at trial.

It is important to note that most family law cases ultimately settle before trial. Thus, employing mediation early in the process can save the parties the significant money and heartache that accompany protracted litigation.

Premarital Agreements

June 27th, 2011

by R. Keith Spencer

Premarital agreements are contracts executed by fiancés, which become effective upon marriage. Their purpose is to clearly define the rights and property of spouses in the event of death or divorce. They are intended to prevent unnecessary litigation and unpleasantness. However, broaching the subject of premarital agreements is frequently difficult for people planning their weddings. Just like executing a will requires acknowledgement of mortality, a “prenup” admits that the marriage could end.

Generally speaking, property owned by the parties prior to the marriage is separate property and remains separate property thereafter. Property acquired during the marriage (except by inheritance) is community property that can be divided by the courts at the end of the marriage. Wages and retirement earned during the marriage are generally community property.

A 1948 constitutional amendment authorized Texas spouses to partition and exchange separate and community property. In 1980, another amendment authorized spouses to agree that income from separate property would remain separate property. Both of these provisions are common in premarital agreements today. Another popular provision provides that no community estate will be formed and the parties’ wages and other property will forever remain separate property.

Texas requires that all premarital agreements be in writing and signed by both parties. The terms of an agreement cannot be grossly unfair or unconscionable, and both parties must provide adequate disclosure of their assets and liabilities. The document must be signed by the parties voluntarily and without undue duress. Presenting your intended with a prenuptial agreement at the altar may render it unenforceable.

Only about three percent of first-time spouses execute prenuptial agreements, compared to about 20 percent of second-time spouses. A prenuptial agreement is vastly more important in cases where the parties own significant property prior to the marriage.

Parties contemplating marriage are encouraged to engage in candid and serious discussions about their finances and debts. It is not inappropriate to discuss your financial plans with your intended life partner. A Bailey & Galyen attorney will provide you with a free consultation to discuss prenuptial agreements and whether one would be appropriate in your circumstances. Arrange your free appointment as far in advance of the wedding as possible.

Ten Tips for Divorcing Parents

June 27th, 2011

by Keith Spencer

Divorce is never easy on kids, but there are many ways parents can help lessen the impact of their break-up on their children:

Never disparage your former spouse in front of your children. Because children know they are “part mom” and “part dad,” the criticism can batter the child’s self-esteem.

Do not use your children as messengers between you and your former spouse. The less the children feel a part of the battle between their parents, the better.

Reassure your children that they are loved and that the divorce is not their fault. Many children assume that they are to blame for their parent’s hostility.

Encourage your children to see your former spouse frequently. Do everything within your power to accommodate the visitation.

At every step during your divorce, remind yourself that your children’s interests – not yours – are paramount, and act accordingly. Lavish them with love at each opportunity.

Your children may be tempted to act as your caretaker. Resist the temptation to let them. Let your peers, adult family members, and mental health professionals be your counselors and sounding board. Let your children be children.

If you have a drinking or drug problem, get counseling right away. An impairment inhibits your ability to reassure your children and give them the attention they need at this difficult time.

If you are the non-custodial parent, pay your child support. The loss of income facing many children after divorce puts them at a financial disadvantage that has a pervasive effect on the rest of their lives.

If you are the custodial parent and you are not receiving child support, do not tell your children. It feeds into the child’s sense of abandonment and further erodes his or her stability.

If at all possible, do not uproot your children. Stability in their residence and school life helps buffer children from the trauma of their parent’s divorce.

What You Need to Know About Divorce in Texas

February 18th, 2011

Texas Divorce Law

In Texas, a divorce can either be granted for “fault” or “no fault.”  In a “no fault” divorce, a party has to tell the Court that the marriage has simply broken down and that there is no hope for reconciliation.

A “fault” divorce in Texas is a divorce based on cruel treatment, adultery, conviction of a felony with imprisonment of at least a year, abandonment in excess of one year, living apart for at least three years, or confinement in a mental hospital for at least three years without hope of recovery.  A “fault” divorce is most likely when there are contested issues involving children or property and the other party’s past behavior should be taken into consideration by the Court.  At Bailey & Galyen, our experienced divorce attorneys will consider your case carefully to help you determine which type of divorce is right for you.

Bailey & Galyen provides a free initial consultation to all clients. To set up an appointment, contact our office by calling 1-866-300-1529 today.

Additionally, Texas divorce’s can either be contested or uncontested.  An uncontested divorce is one in which you and your spouse have agreed on all matters, both children and property related.  A contested divorce is one where there is not complete agreement.  A contested divorce is not necessarily a hostile one.  It simply means there is a disagreement that must be resolved.

Some of the child related matters that must be decided are:

  • the rights and duties of each parent;
  • the possession schedule for each parent
  • child support and health insurance for the child

Property issues that come along with a divorc include determining what property is community property and what property is separate property, the value of that property, the division of property and alimony/spousal support.

The child and property issues are most often resolved in one of three ways:

  • settlement through informal negotiations
  • settlement through mediation
  • final trial

Contact Bailey & Galyen Today

We answer our phones 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. You can contact our office by calling 1-866-300-1529 to set up a free initial consultation. Evening and weekend consultations are available upon request. Se habla Español.